
Top Story - Video Tele/Presence Configuration Options
The graphics with this story can be found in the
Tele/Presence Newsletter here.Here are just a few of the various types of tele/presence systems for your review and consideraton. This presentation focuses more on office and portable video tele/presence that other types of collaboration systems such as slow-scan, whiteboards, computer (wiki, blog) and others.
What I am trying to show is that most tele/presence video systems focus on people, rather than the problems the people are discussing. In my humble opinion, the focus should be on the problem, not people. There are many reasons but one of them is that most people don't feel comfortable being on video and really don't like the way they look (partially or largely due to the Aspect Ratio*). For example, I was looking for systems that show a problem such as quality control situation on a manufacturing assembly line, transportation disaster, environmental hazard, poor health conditions in food processing, or something like the situation on an oil rig and cleanup, to name but a few of the problems that businesses face. Here is a medical example, a medical diagnosis of a sick infant where bringing the "person (doctor) to the problem" is critical.
Below is a more recent example of tele-medicine, from Cisco. Please excuse the size of the image.
Tele-consultation is more than than using the video image of the to show medical problems, yet, provide "doctors without borders" to patients anywhere. However, both Polycom and Cisco interface medical systems such as from AMD Telemedicine and others. For example, in the Polycom system allows the Polycom Practitioner Cart HDX "to easily connect to medical peripheral devices with integrated switch box and connection panel (digital in-band stethoscopes and video scopes)."
Overview of Video Tele/Presence Options
The first example (below) is an overhead video system where documents, parts, objects and almost anything else can be placed and the problem discussed without ever showing a person.
In this example, the user sets up a portable video system easily and can again "bring the system to the problem."
NOTE: The following are examples of various kinds of systems. There is no bias as to which one is more useful or advanced than the others. Simply let the "function drive the features." However, I do like portable systems. Here is one from Polycom showing the user presenting in an outdoor setting.
Next, again from Polycom, we see an office desktop video situation. I liked this as it uses a large screen intended to give the "immersive-effect" of life-like images on by both parties.
This next one is a new approach. Originally, created and developed by Microsoft called Roundtable, now sold by Polycom is integrated with Microsoft Office Communicator part of Microsoft Communications Server and provides group video with 360° panoramic view of the conference room. In additon voice, and instant messaging are brought together into one seamless experience connected easily via a USB port and record the meeting using Microsoft Live Meeting.
The next one is from TelePresenceTech intended to provide for person-to-person conferencing with "eye contact." While it is often perceived that "look em in the eye" is a critical component in video conferencing, our research has indicated it is less important because one-to-one video conferences are nearly always done with people already known, even well-known to one another. That is, the vast majority of personal and small group teleconferences are done with people they have already met face-to-face. More on this issue in future newsletters.
This one is from Cisco. I selected this one as the unit moves away from the desktop opening up the system for more than one person on either end.
Here are three other options from Cisco: Wall-mounted, Free-standing single-screen and Free-standing multi-screen. I selected these as offering options as "flexible inplace" installations of video conferencing systems. That is, when the system is needed is can be installed without the cost of expensive room design and preparation. This also suggests that the "message is more important than the media."
Below from Asstra, is another variation of a free-standing unit. This unit can combined "live" broadcast video feeds from various television sources, prerecorded video feeds, including DVD and VCR, live and/or prerecorded security and surveillance video and PC-generated presentations, documents, and spreadsheets onto the presentation screen.
Next, are two of my favorite ideas, not necessarily these ones. That is, "rollabout" systems can be moved to the hospital operating room, to the assembly line, flown out to sea on a ship or oil rig and shipped almost anywhere. The first one is from TelePresenceTech.
This one is from Polycom brings the "expertise to the problem." That is, a group of subject matter experts can gather and send in the system to the problem or person for discussion, exploration and problem-solving.
Below in a portable slow-scan video system from long ago. The ease-of-use, portability and single-button use made this system for nearly all video teleconferencing situations because in most instances "nothing is moving." That is, nearly all PowerPoint presentations, business settings, crisis conditions, there is no motion, so there is no need for full-motion video.
This next set of examples moves into small group then large group. Here is an example from Cisco of a small group lecture where the presenter is live with one group and other students are remote but both groups can lecture-slides.
From TelePresenceTech, is a 3D lecturer designed with "aligned eye contact" in order for the viewers to get the "immersive-effect." While I like "immersive" video, there is little evidence, in my thirty years in this business, to suggest that it is required or even desired by the audience. We all watch TV and don't feel the need to be "immersed" with the newscaster or television program. Certainly 3D brings us closer in movies but may also have negative impacts in business meetings.
Speaking of "immersive-video," here is an example Cisco. Having used their single- and three-screen systems, it is very effective for small group meetings.
From Polycom, is another approach to "immersive-video." Both companies offer a wide range of solutions for small group (under 30, typically less than 15 people).
Here is one more example of group video teleconferencing systems (source: stock photo).
The last example is the Polycom's "cinematic video wall" with 16 feet of seemless; every participant is shown in high definition, true-to-life dimensions.
This has been a brief introduction to various video tele/presence systems (video conferencing, or teleconferencing, if you prefer). While the focus has been primarily on "room" systems including those that offer movable room-to-room systems, from my long-time experience, should give you an idea of what "car make and model" you could make a good choice to select for effective person-to-person or group meetings.
*Television suffers or rather television adds 33% more "weight" to you because of the Aspect Ratio. That is, television puts on the "pounds." The two standard Aspect Ratios are 4:3 or 1.33:1 referred to as Standard is used in home video which means the width is 33% wider than its height. The other standard Aspect Ratio is Widescreen used in HDTV-high definition television is 16:9 or 1.78:1. In other words, Widescreen nearly doubles your "weight." If you don't have a lot of experience with being on television or television production, you can understand why people don't like the way they look on it.